WASHINGTON, Jan 10 (IPS) - As the fourth anniversary of the devastating earthquake in Haiti approaches on Jan. 12, development analysts are decrying an ongoing lack of transparency in U.S. foreign aid to the country, even as those assistance streams are drying up.
haiti shack 640
From what is known of U.S. post-earthquake funding to Haiti, it appears that a notably small proportion of money from USAID, the countyâ€™s main foreign aid arm, is going directly to local Haitian businesses, institutions and organisations.3
â€œSixty percent goes to firms operating inside the beltway, disappearing in a black box,â€ Jake Johnson of the Centre for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), a Washington think tank, told IPS. â€œThat makes it very hard to determine how and when the funds reach the ground.â€
Even though the United States offered three billion dollars in aid for Haiti after the earthquake, less than one percent of the 1.3 billion dollars in obligated USAID fundsÂ â€" money designated specifically for Haitian recovery efforts â€" has gone directly to local Haitian groups.
â€œWhen so little of the funding reaches Haitians themselves, it takes them out of the decision-making process and ensures that aid programmes are not actually responsive to the needs of people on the ground,"Â Johnson says.
He believes that aid money can often be better utilised in post-emergency situations if donor governments ensure a high level of transparency around those assistance flows, and if they direct as much of these funds as possible towards developing new industries.
A USAID official accounts for these apparent discrepancies by noting thatÂ â€œpart of the challenge of making more awards directly to Haitian entities â€" public and private â€" has been that few of them have the internal financial controls in place to ensure compliance with U.S. government terms and conditions.â€
The official told IPS the agency is trying to address this impediment by working directly with Haitian organisations to build their â€œfinancial control capabilitiesâ€, as well as to educate them about USAID procurement procedures and provide them with financial services.
â€œMany USAID-funded partners already work with numerous Haitian NGOs â€" more than 400 â€" through contractor and grantee sub-awards as well as arrangements with local vendors.â€
Half of the data is missing
So if less than one percent of USAID funding has gone to Haitian groups, where has the rest of this money been directed? The lack of funding transparency makes it impossible to know for sure.
â€œReports on contractors are not actually done according to the Office of Inspector General for USAID,â€ says Johnson.
USAIDâ€™s primary contractors are required to report on their subcontractorsâ€™ activities, and this data in turn is supposed to be made public. â€œBut this information is nowhere to be found,â€ Vijaya Ramachandran, a senior fellow with the Centre for Global Development (CGD), a Washington think tank,Â wrote this week.
The USAID official told IPS that â€œall reported subcontract and sub-award information is published publiclyâ€ through a governmentÂ website. But Ramachandran asserts that â€œalmost half of the transactions dataâ€ are missing important data that identify individual vendors.
Lawmakers have noticed similar problems.Â LegislationÂ passed the U.S. House of Representatives in mid-December that would require a government audit of U.S. assistance in Haiti. (That bill is currently awaiting a vote in the Senate.)
USAID gave seven of the 10 largest contracts for operations in Haiti to Chemonics International, a for-profit provider that Johnson says is the largest USAID contractor in the world. Chemonicsâ€™s two largest projects in Haiti include the WINNER Project and the Office of Transitions Initiative, which Johnson describes as â€œtheÂ more political arm of USAIDâ€.
The project was designed to provide aid to countries afflicted by natural disasters or political turmoil, and following the earthquake it immediately provided disaster relief for displaced Haitians.
Nonetheless, the public is unable to ascertain how Chemonics spent the vast majority of its multi-million-dollar contracts in Haiti due to USAIDâ€™s lack of oversight reports.
â€œThe inspector-general found that Chemonics regularly runs short of its goals and over its budget,â€ CEPRâ€™s Johnson says. â€œThis is typical, but itâ€™s become particularly evident in Haiti because of the earthquake.â€
In addition to development and reconstruction aid, Washington is also seeking to assist Haitian recovery efforts by strengthening the countryâ€™s garments industry. Doing so, however, has presented a different set of challenges.
Following the earthquake, USAID partnered with the Clinton Foundation, the Inter-American Bank and Sae-A Trading, a Korean textile manufacturer, to construct the Caracol Industrial Park. Although the agency predicted that the complex would create up to 65,000 jobs, media reports suggest that as of last September the park had created fewer than 1,500 jobs.
Furthermore, although the projectâ€™s financers gave hundreds of small-scale farmers 3,200 dollars each to vacate their land for the complex, 95 percent of that land today reportedly remains inactive. Meanwhile, Haitian garment factories, including Caracol Park, are said to be openly flaunting minimum wage laws by paying their employees a mere 4.56 dollars a day, rather than the 6.85 dollars per day stipulated by the government.
Other U.S. attempts to bolster the textiles sector have started out more strongly, but been beset by pre-existing measures.
In the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake, the U.S. Congress passed the Haiti Economic Lift Programme (HELP) Act in the hopes of stimulating the countryâ€™s economy by boosting apparels exports, long a cornerstone of Haitian industry. Haitiâ€™s clothing exports to the U.S. have indeed risen by 25 percent since 2009, creating 30,000 jobs, a number that is expected to double by 2016.
Because Haitian apparel imports into the United States are restricted based on a rule of origin, however, certain types of clothing imports over a certain quota must be produced using U.S. materials. These measures are designed to benefit the U.S. textile industry.
Although the HELP Act partially ameliorated these complex trade restrictions, the quotasÂ and tariffs that the United States places on the Haitian apparel industry continue to inhibit trade-based economic growth.
The CGDâ€™s Kimberly Elliot told IPS that U.S. red tape on Haitian imports today consists of a â€œcomplex maze of caps and rules of origins. Thatâ€™s unlike the European Union, Canada and Japan, all of which have simplified restrictions on rules of origins for states that the U.N. designates as least-developed countries.â€
She calls the rule of origin a â€œburdenâ€ for Haiti and argues that if U.S. trade restrictions were less complex, post-earthquake Haitian trade would have a greater potential for growth.
© Inter Press Service (2014) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service
Latest News Headlines
Read the latest news stories:
- Human Rights Low on U.S-Africa Policy Summit Thursday, July 31, 2014
- Cash Transfers Drive Human Development in Brazil Thursday, July 31, 2014
- Cameroon’s Muslim Clerics Turn to Education to Shun Boko Haram Thursday, July 31, 2014
- World Bank Board Declines to Revise Controversial Draft Policies Thursday, July 31, 2014
- Land Grabbing – A New Political Strategy for Arab Countries Wednesday, July 30, 2014
- China’s ‘Left-Behind Girls’ Learn Self-Protection Wednesday, July 30, 2014
- Bill to Fight Discrimination Against HIV-Positive Venezuelans Wednesday, July 30, 2014
- Is Europe’s Breadbasket Up for Grabs? Wednesday, July 30, 2014
- Israel Lobby Galvanises Support for Gaza War Wednesday, July 30, 2014
- Oil Alliance Between China and Costa Rica Comes to Life Again Wednesday, July 30, 2014