Sri Lanka Prepares ‘Certificates of Absence’

  • by Amantha Perera (colombo)
  • Tuesday, April 29, 2014
  • Inter Press Service

The assessment is expected to lead to recommendations for assistance and, in some cases, bring closure, say government officials and members of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).3

In January, the ICRC made a proposal to the Sri Lankan government to carry out an assessment of the needs of families of those who went missing in the last two-and-a-half decades.

"We are doing this countrywide from April. We will approach a representative sampling of families of the missing and understand what their needs are," David Quesne, ICRC deputy head of delegation in Sri Lanka told IPS. The ministry of social welfare is the government partner for the survey.

The issue is controversial. Sri Lanka's sectarian war began in the early 1980s, with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) demanding a separate state for minority Tamils in the north. The rebels were finally defeated by government forces in 2009.

More than 70,000 people were killed in the conflict, and estimates of the number of those missing have varied, with some putting the number as high as 40,000.

The ICRC only registers details of missing persons once a tracing request is received. Quesne said right now the ICRC has over 16,000 such requests dating back to the nineties.

Last month, Sri Lanka rejected a resolution at the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council that requested the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to launch an investigation into alleged rights violations, including the issue of the missing. Foreign minister Gamini Laksham Peiris said the government would not support any such inquiry.

"We are continuing with national mechanisms," he said, highlighting the work done with the ICRC and a needs assessment of the war displaced carried out with the UN.

Gwenaelle Fontana, ICRC protection officer in Sri Lanka, told IPS that the survey would be island-wide and would use a sample selection of families. "The initial idea is to assess the needs of these families. We will assess all the aspects - economic, administrative, legal and psycho-social," she said.

The sample will include families of members of the armed forces listed as missing.

"It will be a precious tool for the authorities in designing policy in favour of such families," Fontana said.

The families of the missing have never been categorised as a special needs group during Sri Lanka's post-war reconstruction phase.

"That is unfair because we have a unique set of needs. We have to look for our missing loved ones while making sure the family is provided for," said the mother of a missing person from northern Kilinochchi who did not wish to be identified.

Sri Lankan officials have indicated plans to assist the families of the missing. A presidential commission on the missing is set to conclude by August. It has so far has received 16,000 complaints.

The ICRC survey is likely to conclude towards the end of the year, and officials say the report will be handed over to the government for action.

Between late 2008 and April 2009, the ICRC had evacuated around 14,000 people in need of medical attention. But later some of them were reported untraceable.

"We have received requests from families or close relatives of evacuees that they had lost track," Quesne said.

The ICRC began looking for the missing evacuees in January in the northern district of Jaffna. By end-March, at least 26 cases had been successfully traced.

Fontana told IPS that the government authorities had shown interest in issuing ‘certificates of absence' for the missing, instead of ‘death certificates'. Such a certificate eases legal and administrative work like pension payments and dealing with legal documents like land deeds.

"The authorities have expressed much interest. But as adaptation of the legislative framework is always complex, the process of issuing certificates of absence will naturally take time," Fontana said.

© Inter Press Service (2014) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service

Where next?