Army Admits Using JetBlue Data
This print version has been auto-generated from http://www.globalissues.org/article/444/army-admits-using-jetblue-data
The following article is from the popular tech web site Wired looking at how millions of passenger records were used in a military effort to analyse data, without their knowledge. This issue is another concerning the debate between invasion of privacy and the war on terrorism. The original article can be found at http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,60540,00.html1.
Army Admits Using JetBlue Data
By Ryan Singel and Noah Shachtman
September 23, 2003
Millions of JetBlue passenger records were used in a military effort whose methods closely resemble those employed in the notorious Terrorism Information Awareness database program, the Army confirmed Monday.
Last week, defense contractor Torch Concepts came under heavy scrutiny after Wired News revealed2 that the company had crunched fliers' private data without their knowledge.
On Monday, Army spokesman Maj. Gary Tallman said the information was used by Torch Concepts to test a prototype of a data-mining system designed to screen out terrorists who might want to infiltrate or attack Army bases worldwide.
According to a corporate press release3 from May 8, 2002, the Torch-built system would identify "abnormal events or activities that may include rebel actions before damaging events occur." To do this, the contractor would apply "intelligent pattern recognition in identifying latent relationships and behaviors that may help point to potential terrorist threats."
To privacy advocates, that sounds a lot like TIA's mission4 (PDF) of researching "data search and pattern recognition technologies ... based on the idea that terrorist planning activities or a likely terrorist attack could be uncovered by searching for indications of terrorist activities in vast quantities of transaction data."
"This looks and feels like the data Valdez," said Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation5.
"Look at how we found out about this, only because one company was foolish enough to speak publicly about it," Tien added. "We should put the brakes on all these data-mining programs, and have a serious national conversation, because travel data is just one example of the many kinds of data every data-mining operation wants to suck in from private businesses."
On Monday, the Electronic Privacy Information Center6 filed three Freedom of Information Act requests in an attempt to uncover how the government might have used JetBlue passenger data in the development of government databases.
Tallman emphasized that the Army itself never handled the raw passenger data and that it was interested in testing the pattern-matching technology, not accessing a list of JetBlue's customers.
It remains unclear whether the Army system for protecting military bases was put into effect, and if so, what kinds of data were used to detect terrorist attacks ahead of time.
Torch secured the job with the Army as a subcontractor to SRS Technologies, a company based in Newport Beach, California.
"Torch worked directly with the Army and had a specific mandate to ferret information out of data streams" to find the "abnormal behavior of secretive people," said Bart Edsall, who runs business development for SRS.
That's something SRS should know a thing or two about. The company bills itself as the "prime support contractor" for the Information Awareness Office of Darpa (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency) -- the Pentagon research division that spearheaded work on TIA.
SRS helped Darpa evaluate various technical proposals for TIA. The company also aided the agency in funding decisions related to the project.
Edsall denied that Torch had anything to do with these efforts.
Torch's corporate counsel, Richard Marsden, declined to comment.
Darpa's spokeswoman, Jan Walker, denied any connection between Darpa and the research involving the JetBlue passenger data.
"Torch Concepts does not hold a Darpa contract. They are not involved in any of our Information Awareness Office programs," she wrote in an e-mail.
JetBlue7 CEO and founder David Neeleman said on Sunday that the original request to help with the Torch study came from the Transportation Security Administration8. The Army then verified for JetBlue that Torch was trustworthy.
"As far as we are concerned, the Army referred us to Torch," said Neeleman, who has been personally replying to irate customer's e-mails about the privacy breach by the discount airline.
But Neeleman said he was unaware of Torch's relationship as a subcontractor to SRS -- or to any other defense firm, for that matter.
He added, "I believe the data has been destroyed and I'm moving on."
General Fair Use Notice
This reposted page may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Globalissues.org is making this article available in efforts to advance the understanding of the workings, impact and direction of various global issues. I believe that this constitutes a “fair use” of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
This article is part of the following collection:
- War on Terror: Crackdown on Civil Rights; War on Freedom
- Amnesty International: Human Rights Backlash
- U.S. Intensifies the War of Words
- America’s hyperreal war on terrorism
- Post-September 11 Corporate Stance
- Goodbye to Patriotism
- The Silence on Terrorism
- The New McCarthyism
- American Caesar
- Farewell Liberty
- Bush’s Aggressive Accounting
- Race War
- The War on Dissent Widens
- The USA PATRIOT Act Was Planned Before 9/11
- FBI digs deeper into the Web
- Seven Points
- The War on Freedom and Democracy in the EU
- Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
- How I became a target for America’s zealots
- Washington’s Eye on the Internet
- High treason in the U.S. government
- US Librarians See 'Big Brother' Monitoring
- Muted Response to Ashcroft’s Sneak Attack on Liberties
- Our Designated Killers, 'Where Is the Outrage?'
- Our voices are lost in the tide of intolerance sweeping America
- Broad Domestic Role Asked for C.I.A. and the Pentagon
- Amnesty International: No Shortcut to Genuine Security
- Asian Security Talks Risk Giving Green Light to Repression
- South African Anti-Terror Bill Draconian
- Rage. Mistrust. Hatred. Fear. Uncle Sam’s Enemies Within
- US Anti-war Activists Hit by Secret Airport Ban
- On the Record
- Army Admits Using JetBlue Data
- Congress Defunds Controversial 'Total Information' Program
- Federal Judge Rules Part of Patriot Act Unconstitutional
- Executive Power after 9-11 in the United States
- War on Terror or War on Liberties?
- War on Global Values
- India’s 'No' to 9-11 Legacy
- Homeland Security: The price of safety
- Republicans See Signs That Pentagon Is Evading Oversight
- Is the Pentagon spying on Americans?
- Judge Rules NSA Warrantless Spy Program Unconstitutional
- Pentagon is keeping secret tabs on peaceful protest activities
- Is Princeton Professor and Retired Marine on Government No-Fly List for Criticizing the White House?
- Corporate Takeover of US Intelligence
- US and Europe Near Agreement on Private Data
(Note that listed here are only those hyperlinks to other articles from other web sites or elsewhere on this web site. Other sources such as journal, books and magazines, are mentioned above in the original text. Please also note that links to external sites are beyond my control. They might become unavailable temporarily or permanently since you read this, depending on the policies of those sites, which I cannot unfortunately do anything about.)
Back to top