Signing Up to the International Criminal Court by December 2002

Author and Page information

  • by Anup Shah
  • This Page Last Updated Wednesday, April 17, 2002

Signing up to the International Criminal Court (ICC) was also an arduous process, as some nations wanted to undermine the ICC.

On this page:

  1. The December 2000 Deadline For Signing up to the ICC was important
  2. US and others had signed last minute to the ICC in December 2000

The December 2000 Deadline For Signing up to the ICC was important

Nations had until December 2000 to sign up if they wanted to participate in the discussions about the ICC. Not signing would have meant that while that nation would still be subject to it, they would not have been able to participate in decisions at future ICC discussions.

After the deadline to sign, countries can ratify but no longer sign the treaty. A country that had failed to sign would lose influence during negotiations to decide how the court will work.

Back to top

US and others had signed last minute to the ICC in December 2000

With the looming deadline to sign the International Criminal Court at the end of December 2000, the United States signed1, as did some other nations, so that it would allow them to be involved in future negotiations about this treaty.

The U.S. had voiced concerns about their soldiers being possibly tried for war crimes but the ratification of this major new international institution didn't get much media coverage2 as Danny Schechter describes (in the previous link), so the possibility of broad debate had been further minimized.

Because the U.S. government has no intention of ratifying the court's treaty anytime soon, it has focused on the supposed outrage that the court would have jurisdiction over the citizens of a state that has not ratified the treaty. But it is common practice for a government to prosecute a foreign national for crimes committed on its territory without first seeking permission of the foreigner's government. The jurisdiction of the ICC amounts to no more than a delegation of this widely accepted power for the most serious human rights crimes. Indeed, Washington itself routinely exercises far more expansive jurisdiction in unilaterally pursuing alleged terrorists or drug traffickers even when their crimes were not committed on U.S. soil.

A Selective U.S. Vision of Justice3, Human Rights Watch World Report 2000.

(By May 2002, the Bush Administration unsigned, thus withdrawing from the ICC, citing unfounded concerns regarding sovereignty, as discussed on previous pages on this site.)

Back to top

Where next?

Related articles

  1. International Criminal Court: Introduction
  2. United States and the International Criminal Court
  3. Signing Up to the International Criminal Court by December 2002
  4. Establishing the International Criminal Court in 1998
  5. International Criminal Court: The Pinochet Case
  6. International Criminal Court Links

Online Sources:

(Note that listed here are only those hyperlinks to other articles from other web sites or elsewhere on this web site. Other sources such as journal, books and magazines, are mentioned above in the original text. Please also note that links to external sites are beyond my control. They might become unavailable temporarily or permanently since you read this, depending on the policies of those sites, which I cannot unfortunately do anything about.)

  1. 'US signs up for war crimes court', BBC, January 1, 2001, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/newsid_1095000/1095343.stm
  2. Danny Schechter, 'The International Criminal Court: Why Didn't The Media Tell Us?', MediaChannel.org, April 17, 2002, http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/icc.shtml
  3. http://www.hrw.org/wr2k1/intro/intro18.html

Author and Page Information

  • by Anup Shah
  • Created: Monday, July 20, 1998
  • Last Updated: Wednesday, April 17, 2002

Back to top