International Criminal Court: The Pinochet Case

Author and Page information

  • by Anup Shah
  • This Page Last Updated Tuesday, September 18, 2001

Before the International Criminal Court (ICC), there have been numerous political problems in bringing people to justice for committing horrendous crimes. But a number of specific criminal tribunals have started to perhaps raise the stakes. As the title of an article1 from the French paper, Le Monde suggests, even Presidents are under pressure on issues of crimes against humanity.

Taking one example here, this involves the case of the prosecution of former Chilean dictator, Augusto Pinochet. He has been accused of ordering killings, abductions and torture of over 1000 Chileans and others during his 17 years of rule: The original ruling2 against his arrest, October 1998, in UK due to his diplomatic/sovereign immunity, would have meant that people like Sadaam Hussain and Slobodan Milosevic, would not be arrested or tried for crimes3 that they have committed while they were heads of state -- well not in the UK, anyway.

On this page:

  1. A YoYo of Rulings!
  2. Political Will
  3. US Involvement In Chilean Destabilization
  4. More Information

A YoYo of Rulings!

A subsequent potentially important step forward, where the original ruling against his arrest was overturned4 by Britain's highest court itself was overturned5 because one of the judges' wife worked for Amnesty International! But there had then been another decision by the House of Lords who subsequently ruled that Pinochet did not have immunity6 from prosecution on charges of gross human rights violation. In fact, April 15, 1999 saw Jack Straw, the Home Secretary in Britain, reveal that he had given authority for extradition proceedings of Pinochet, to Spain, to go ahead7.

France was also re-evaluating whether it can prosecute Pinochet in France, for crimes against humanity. (The families of two French men who had been killed in Chile had their complaints thrown out by a previous magistrate.)

On October 8, 1999 a British Magistrate decided officially authorized8 Pinochet's extradition to Spain. (Also check out this link9 to a Democracy Now radio show interview for more about this ruling.)

Just as this was turning out to be a successful case for human rights, in mid January 2000, Jack Straw, British Home Secratary, claimed that medical doctors had declared Pinochet was unfit to stand trial and had to be returned to Chile. The leading doctor said that he did not claim he could not stand trial, as this is beyond his area of responsibilities and expertise. However, the way it was put, Straw had misled the members of Parliament10.

This ended up allowing Pinochet to be released. He returned to Chile, in apparent good health11. However, there his immunity was revoked12 and at the beginning of December, 2000, a Chilean judge ordered the arrest of Pinochet13 in order to try him, while Argentina has also been seeking extradition. While in the middle of January 2001 there was initially a U-turn, at the end of January 2001, Pinochet's charges were reinstated14.

As former dictator Augusto Pinochet was preparing to take pretrial mental exams, and as the Chilean military was releasing a report acknowledging that during the Pinochet dictatorship the bodies of scores of political opponents and leftists had been thrown into the ocean, perhaps the satirical Santiago tabloid The Clinic put the situation most pungently. Why Bother With the Tests? asked the headline. Only a Psychopath Would Toss Bodies Into the Sea.


Pinochet denied ever ordering anyone's death and blamed the massacre on regional subordinates. ... Retired Gen. Joaquin Lagos ... breaking two decades of silence, said Pinochet was fully informed of the mass killing carried out by his troops. They took their eyes out of their sockets with daggers, breaking their jaws, breaking their legs, General Lagos said. They shot them in segments, first the legs, then the sexual organs, then the heart with submachine guns...there was not even a final mercy shot.

Marc Cooper, Chile and the End of Pinochet15, The Nation Magazine, Feb 26, 2001.

Back to top

Political Will

There had been an intense debate16 between the universal jurisdiction of international law, used as the basis for the arrest, and the claim that this violates national sovereignty. Many political factors17 have prevented effective resolution of this issue thus far. Double standards18 when it comes to speaking out about trying some people but not others because there may have been a political motive in the past does not help either.

Perhaps another thing emerging from this of importance is that there seems to be a possibility that other brutal Latin American dictators of the past could also be brought to justice19.

As mentioned in the opening quote above, some have pointed out that while people like Pinochet can potentially be bought to justice, others from more powerful nations have hardly ever been held accountable. However, while there is a lot of credibility to that argument, it is also not an excuse not to try anyone at all! If the stronger nations are able to prosecute former dictators and others, who they have sometimes supported, especially in the name of humanity and democracy, then hopefully, more people in these countries become aware of these issues, and slowly make their own leaders accountable as well, by applying the same high principles that they preach onto others.

Back to top

US Involvement In Chilean Destabilization

Some have noted USA's surprising relative silence on this matter of human rights -- probably because it has emerged, that in the 70s, Kissinger covered up20 torture and other abuses21 in Chile by the Pinochet Regime.

Recently declassified22 (but censored) official documents show how much the US has been involved in the coup in the 70s, due to US interests and fears of communism and in Chile. (See also this news report23 for more information about that.)

Back to top

More Information

For more web resources, check out the following:

  • The British newspaper, Guardian On-line documentary24.
  • The Pinochet Dispatch25.
  • The National Security Archives have declassified documents26 on line about the role of the US in Chile.
  • The Pinochet Prosecution27 from Human Rights Watch provides updates and reports.
  • Chile and the End of Pinochet28, by Marc Cooper from The Nation Magazine, Feb 26, 2001, looks at some of the issues surrounding the Chilean military's acknowledgment of dumping political opponents into the sea during the Pinochet dictatorship.
  • this link29 from Foreign Policy In Focus.

Back to top

Where next?

Related articles

  1. International Criminal Court: Introduction
  2. United States and the International Criminal Court
  3. Signing Up to the International Criminal Court by December 2002
  4. Establishing the International Criminal Court in 1998
  5. International Criminal Court: The Pinochet Case
  6. International Criminal Court Links

Online Sources:

(Note that listed here are only those hyperlinks to other articles from other web sites or elsewhere on this web site. Other sources such as journal, books and magazines, are mentioned above in the original text. Please also note that links to external sites are beyond my control. They might become unavailable temporarily or permanently since you read this, depending on the policies of those sites, which I cannot unfortunately do anything about.)

  1. Ignacio Ramonet, 'Presidents under pressure', Le Monde Diplomatique, August 2001,
  2. 'The Legal Case for Pinochet', BBC, October 28, 1998,
  3. 'High court decision: a dangerous setback for international law', Amnesty International News Service 210/98, AI INDEX: AMR 22/15/98, 28 October 1998,
  4. Dolores Cortes, 'Pinochet's Immunity Refused By Law Lords', Inter Press Service, November 25, 1998,
  5. 'Pinochet gets new hearing', BBC, December 17, 1998,
  6. Dipankar De Sarkar, 'British Court Upholds Pinochet Arrest', Inter Press Service, March 24, 1999,
  7. 'Straw approves Pinochet's extradition', The Guardian, April 15, 1999,,2763,205077,00.html
  8. 'Wild Cheers, Loud Sobs Over Ruling Against Pinochet', Inter Press Service, October 8, 1999,
  9. Democracy Now! October 8, 1999,
  10. Antony Barnett and Andy McSmith, 'Straw may have misled MPs', The Guardian/Observer, January 16, 2000,,2763,190632,00.html
  11. Gustavo Gonzalez, 'Glowing Pinochet Far from Image of Failing Health', Inter Press Service, March 3, 2000,
  12. 'Chile Supreme Court Rejects Pinochet Immunity', Human Rights Watch, August 8, 2000,
  13. 'Pinochet Arrest Hailed', Human Rights Watch, December 1, 2000,
  14. 'Re-instatement of Pinochet Charges Hailed', Human Rights Watch, January 29, 2001,
  16. Michael Ratner, 'The Pinocher Precedent', The Progressive Response, Foreign Policy In Focus, Volume 3, Number 3, January 28, 1999,
  17. Michael Ratner, 'The Pinochet Precedent', Foreign Policy In Focus, Volume 4, Number 6, February 1999,
  18. Jim Lobe, 'A Tale of Two Terrorists', Inter Press Service, November 22, 1998,
  19. Tito Drago. 'Argentine Activists Meet Spain's 'Pinochet Judge'', Inter Press Service, April 6, 1999,
  20. Lucy Kosimar, 'Kissinger covered up Chile torture', The Guardian, February 28, 1999,,2763,208394,00.html
  21. Jim Lobe, 'New Details of US Complicity in Pinochet Regime', Inter Press Service, March 12, 1999,
  22. 'State Department Release on Chile Shows Suspicions of CIA Involvement in Charles Horman 'Missing' Case', National Security Archives, George Washington University, October 8. 1999,
  23. Jonathan Franklin , 'Files show Chilean blood on US hands', The Guardian, October 11, 1999,,3604,260382,00.html

Author and Page Information

  • by Anup Shah
  • Created: Monday, July 20, 1998
  • Last Updated: Tuesday, September 18, 2001

Back to top