India and Pakistan go Nuclear

Author and Page information

  • by Anup Shah
  • This Page Last Updated Sunday, October 08, 2000

And while the Cold War1 may be over, it looks like there could be another arms race as India2 re-evaluates its nuclear3 policies. In 1998, India performed4 underground nuclear explosions near the Pakistani border. Pakistan reacted by performing it's own tests5. The first detonation by India was taken as a surprise6 -- but should it have been?

On this page:

  1. Double Standards?
  2. Nuclear or Unclear Priorities?

Double Standards?

Double standards are claimed by the two countries because they face tough economic sanctions when France and China, two members of the Security Council and of the "nuclear club", only received condemnation7 for their tests, but no sanctions.

In addition, as claims are made that these deterrents are no guarantee for peace, India and Pakistan make the counter-claim that the "big 5" (USA, Russia, France, UK and China) should therefore reduce their (still) large stockpile if they want to guarantee peace.

There have been many criticisms of the nuclear powers not doing enough8 about their own nuclear weapons proliferation issues, while hypocritically enforcing other nations to cut back or avoid it.

However, it looks like UK will hopefully be setting an example9 to the other powers by attempting to cut it's own arsenal of weapons. A coalition of 8 UN members is also hoping to urge the UN General Assembly10 to tackle the issue of nuclear disarmament.

India had made a very powerful statement via its nuclear tests regarding the fact that the country should no longer be ignored and that it is a legitimate Nuclear power and a possible consideration as a permanent Security Council member. It has been attempting to get a seat for a while now, and this could be a potentially important step forward.

Pakistan then would also have a case to be considered as a permanent Council member. If Pakistan were to also gain a seat, then would that suggest to the rest of the world that for its interests to be considered and for it to be as influential, that nuclear weapons are the way to go?

(The non-democratic nature of the Security Council11 is another topic, and many suggest that the United Nations should not have a Security Council, as the General Assembly is more inclusive. However, the former imperial powers (UK, France, Russia, and USA), do not want this privilege to be extended to everyone, as then it would no longer be an important privilege. Due to emerging powers in Asia, such as India and China, China could not be ignored and were permitted in. India now wants in too it would seem.)

Back to top

Nuclear or Unclear Priorities?

The detonations had enormous popular backing by the Indian people. However, just a couple of months since those nuclear tests, people in India and Pakistan have been talking about the more important and urgent needs of the many poor people rather than increased military arms spending. After all, if a rich nation such as USA spent $5.5 trillion12 between 1940 and 1996 on its nuclear programs, what impact would a fraction of that have on India or Pakistan when they have many other social issues to tackle?

On the 53rd anniversary of the Hiroshima13 bombing, there were large anti-nuclear demonstrations14 and rallies around India and other countries. People are questioning whether India and Pakistan are ignoring15 the lessons learned from the Cold War regarding a nuclear arms race. Their announcement that they will be signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is a move in the right direction, but India has demanded an understandable condition that the US also ratifies it first and Pakistan has said they will wait on India before signing themselves. However, the US decided not to ratify the CTBT.

As India still looks to purchase more military equipment16 it could be that Pakistan will naturally follow thereby allowing an arms race to continue with increased tension for a long time still to come.

Back to top

Where next?

Related articles

  1. Militarization and Weaponization of Outer Space
  2. Star Wars; Phantom Menace or New Hope?
  3. World Military Spending
  4. A Code of Conduct for Arms Sales
  5. Arms Control Links for More Information
  6. Landmines
  7. Military Aid
  8. The US Nuclear Superpower
  9. North Korea and Nuclear Weapons
  10. Iran

Online Sources:

(Note that listed here are only those hyperlinks to other articles from other web sites or elsewhere on this web site. Other sources such as journal, books and magazines, are mentioned above in the original text. Please also note that links to external sites are beyond my control. They might become unavailable temporarily or permanently since you read this, depending on the policies of those sites, which I cannot unfortunately do anything about.)

  1. http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/dd/dd-c01-s01.html
  2. http://www.transnational.org/forum/power/1998/pow08-04.html
  3. http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/apr98/04_29_002.html
  4. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/s/w_asia/newsid_91000/91029.stm
  5. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/s/w_asia/newsid_102000/102096.stm
  6. http://www.oneworld.org/analysis/jonatpower/06jun98.html
  7. http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/may98/19_53_084.html
  8. http://www.cdi.org/weekly/1998/issue27/index.html#3
  9. http://www.cdi.org/weekly/1998/issue25/index.html#2
  10. http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/sept98/03_52_005.html
  11. http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/
  12. http://www.cdi.org/weekly/1998/Issue26/index.html#2
  13. http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/mainn.html
  14. http://www.lycos.com/envirolink/news/stories/3554.html
  15. http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/india_pakistan.html
  16. http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/feb99/06_51_005.html

Author and Page Information

  • by Anup Shah
  • Created: Monday, August 10, 1998
  • Last Updated: Sunday, October 08, 2000

Back to top