Cuba Rebuts International Criticism Over Prisoner's Death
The Cuban government energetically rebutted what it regards as another campaign to discredit it, following the death in prison of a man who, according to the authorities, was not a dissident nor on hunger strike, as the opposition alleges.
In separate declarations, the Cuban Foreign Ministry rebuffed expressions of concern over the demise of prison inmate Wilman Villar by official sources in the United States and Spain, the countries where the fatality aroused most condemnation.
Cuban diplomats regarded the occurrence as regrettable, but 'unusual in Cuba'. Villar, who died Jan. 19 in a hospital intensive care unit, was buried in the cemetery of his home town of Contramaestre in the eastern province of Santiago de Cuba on Jan. 20.
The controversy over the event comes at a time when preparations are in full swing for the forthcoming visit to Cuba of Pope Benedict XVI in late March. His programme will include celebrating an open-air mass in Santiago de Cuba, the capital of the province of the same name, 861 km east of Havana.
A government communiqué published Jan. 21 in the newspaper Granma stated that Villar had been serving a four-year prison sentence for contempt, assault and resisting arrest. It added that his mother-in- law had reported him to the authorities for creating 'a public scandal in which he assaulted his wife and injured her face', and that he had subsequently been freed pending trial.
In contrast, human rights activist Elizardo Sánchez told IPS that the 31-year-old Villar belonged to the dissident Cuban Patriotic Union group, and had been on voluntary hunger strike since he was imprisoned in November 2011 as a protest against the 'summary' trial he had been subjected to. But the government communiqué insisted that 'there is abundant proof and testimony that shows that he was not a 'dissident' nor was he on hunger strike.' It also said that Villar's links with dissident groups in Santiago de Cuba were formed only after he had committed the crimes for which he was tried.
The 'counter-revolutionary elements' with whom he made contact 'convinced him that apparent membership of mercenary groups would allow him to escape justice', according to the official information. Sánchez, on the other hand, blamed the government for Villar's death, calling it a 'tragedy' that in his view 'could have been avoided'.
According to the official version, Villar died Jan. 19 in the intensive care unit of the Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Clinical Surgical Hospital in Santiago de Cuba from 'multiple organ failure following a severe respiratory infection leading to septic shock'. 'His closest relatives were aware of all the procedures employed during his medical care and recognised the efforts made by the team of specialists who treated him,' said the official report released the evening of Jan. 20.
Later that day, another communiqué was distributed to accredited foreign journalists, in which the head of the Foreign Ministry's North America division, Josefina Vidal, said comments on the case from the U.S. Department of State and the White House were an example of 'hypocrisy and double standards'. Washington criticised Villar's death, describing him as a 'courageous defender of human rights in Cuba', and calling for greater international scrutiny of this Caribbean island, including 'full access to prisons' by United Nations Special Rapporteurs and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
'An unfortunate yet unusual event in Cuba has again been distorted and manipulated by narrow self-serving political interests to justify the policy of blockade against our country,' retorted Vidal, according to whom Washington's statements are better suited to the record of human rights violations in the United States than in Cuba.
'It is not in Cuba where 90 prisoners have been executed since January 2010, while another 3,222 inmates remain on death row, awaiting execution. It must be remembered that the United States has already held its first execution of 2012 and its government ruthlessly represses those who dare to denounce the system’s injustice,' Vidal said.
Meanwhile, an unnamed spokesperson for the Cuban Foreign Ministry countered the claims and complaints of the centre- right People's Party government in Spain, and of the European Union. The spokesperson told Prensa Latina, a Cuban state news agency, that neither Madrid nor Brussels have the moral authority to pass judgement on Cuba.
© Inter Press Service (2012) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- Reforming the UN Must Begin with Reforming Staff Representation Monday, November 09, 2026
- Serbia’s Student Movement: From Protest to Power Monday, November 09, 2026
- Drought Cripples Dairy Farmers in Maharashtra in ‘Off the Charts’ Weather Year Monday, November 09, 2026
- I Continue to Accuse Monday, November 09, 2026
- Families who fled Ethiopia for Kenya’s Moyale need food, water and shelter Monday, November 09, 2026
- Security Council LIVE: Strikes on Ukraine’s power grid, as peace talks loom Monday, November 09, 2026
- ‘Exceptional’ extreme temperatures to continue into next year, UN reports Monday, November 09, 2026
- COP31 Litmus Test for International Cooperation Sunday, November 08, 2026
- Beyond the broken glass: The human cost of the 1938 November Pogrom Sunday, November 08, 2026
- ‘For the first time I have my own chair’: Gaza siblings find new freedom Saturday, November 07, 2026
Learn more about the related issues: