THE DOUBLE STANDARD OF NUCLEAR POWERS
On 5 February, the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) entered into force between Russia and the United States. While hailed as a victory by most arms control and disarmament advocates, in reality the treaty has stark consequences for the future of nuclear disarmament, writes Ray Acheson, director of Reaching Critical Will, a project of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom that advocates for nuclear disarmament and monitors nuclear weapon issues.
In this analysis, the author writes that in exchange for US Senate ratification of the treaty, the Obama administration promised 185 billion USD for the modernisation of nuclear weapons, delivery systems, and related infrastructure over the next twenty years while the Russian Duma adopted the treaty only on the condition that the government will invest in the development and production of new types of strategic offensive weapons and in "preserving and developing the necessary research and development base and production capabilities" of Russia's strategic nuclear forces.
Plans to modernise nuclear arsenals cast heavy shadows over prospects for disarmament in any near-term future. While some governments and a large number of civil society groups are trying to initiate negotiations of a nuclear weapons convention -a ban on nuclear weapons- the nuclear weapon possessors appear far from ready to engage in multilateral disarmament talks. But if the danger of nuclear war is to be eliminated, ceasing to plan and build for an eternal nuclear threat must come early, not late, in the process.
(*) Ray Acheson is the director of Reaching Critical Will, a project of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom that advocates for nuclear disarmament and monitors nuclear weapon issues. She is the editor of RCWA's reporting publications and also an anthology of NGO writings, Beyond Arms Control: Choices and Challenges for Nuclear Disarmament (2010).
//NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN CANADA, CZECH REPUBLIC, IRELAND, POLAND, THE UNITED STATES, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM//
© Inter Press Service (2011) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- UNGA’s Long-Drawn Revitalization Efforts Need a Meaningful Outcome, not Another Repetitive Regularity of an Omnibus of Redundancy Friday, December 05, 2025
- UN80 is Less a Reform Than a Survival Manual Friday, December 05, 2025
- In Zimbabwe, School Children Are Turning Waste Into Renewable Energy-Powered Lanterns Friday, December 05, 2025
- Any Resumption of US Tests May Trigger Threats from Other Nuclear Powers Friday, December 05, 2025
- Lebanon: UN peacekeepers warn of ‘clear violations’ following latest Israeli airstrikes Friday, December 05, 2025
- Israeli raids and settler attacks deepen humanitarian crisis in West Bank Friday, December 05, 2025
- Syria: Effort to buttress human rights since Assad’s fall, ‘only the beginning of what needs to be done’ Friday, December 05, 2025
- Mozambique’s displaced facing massive needs as attacks intensify Friday, December 05, 2025
- Businesses Impact Nature on Which They Depend — IPBES Report Finds Thursday, December 04, 2025
- ‘Low- and Middle-Income Countries Need Better Data, Not Just Better Tech’ Thursday, December 04, 2025
Learn more about the related issues: