Prioritise human rights, not economics — UN expert
Australia has been urged to place human rights before national interest in its allocation of foreign aid, following a review of the country’s donor programme by an independent U.N. expert. Wrapping up his first mission to Australia last weekend, Cephas Lumina, a specialist designated by the U.N. Human Rights Council, released a statement recommending the government develop a 'consistent approach' to its international development work.
'Although some of its programme sectors directly or indirectly promote human rights, AusAID (Australian Agency for International Development) does not have a specific policy requiring all its programmes to be consistent with a human rights-based approach to development,' Lumina said. Noting the free trade agreement negotiations currently underway in the region, Lumina said Australia should use foreign funding to help countries achieve human rights obligations, rather than to push national economic interests.
'Development assistance should not be used as a means of inducing Pacific Island countries to enter into free trade agreements,' he said. 'Australia’s aid programme should be guided by the needs of recipient communities, rather than focused on Australia’s national interests.'
The Australian government has committed to increasing development aid to 0.5 per cent of the country’s Gross National Income (GNI) by 2015, but still below the internationally agreed official development assistance (ODA) target of 0.7 per cent of GNI. According to AusAid, a quarter of its total aid budget is allocated to the Pacific Islands and Papua New Guinea, with $1,085.4 million channeled to the region in 2010-11, an increase of six per cent over total aid flows in 2009-10.
Despite this, the Australian government acknowledges that no Pacific country will meet all the Millennium Development Goals. Lumina’s review comes following an Oxfam report released last week, which cautioned western governments, including Australia, against militarising their aid programmes.
The report revealed nations were increasingly allocating donor dollars based on military, security and geopolitical interests, rather than poverty or humanitarian needs. Since 2001, more than 40 per cent of the total $17.8 billion increase in development aid from the OECD donors has gone to just two countries - Afghanistan and Iraq - with the remainder dispersed between 150 countries, according to Oxfam.
© Inter Press Service (2011) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- ‘Unfathomable But Avoidable’ Suffering in Gaza Hospitals, Says Volunteer Nurse Thursday, January 29, 2026
- Melting Reserves of Power: Mongolia’s Glaciers and the Future of Energy and Food Security Thursday, January 29, 2026
- UN chief ‘deeply concerned’ by escalation of violence in South Sudan Thursday, January 29, 2026
- Violence roiling Nigeria extends beyond religious lines, amid a deepening humanitarian crisis Thursday, January 29, 2026
- World News in Brief: IOM warning for Sudan returnees, Nipah virus alert for India, food security in Afghanistan Thursday, January 29, 2026
- Choose peace over chaos, Guterres urges as he sets out final-year priorities Thursday, January 29, 2026
- Gambia’s Supreme Court to Decide on FGM Ban Wednesday, January 28, 2026
- Talent Wasted: Afghanistan’s Educated Women Adapt Under Taliban Restrictions Wednesday, January 28, 2026
- Exiled: Myanmar’s Resistance to Junta Rule Flourishes Abroad Wednesday, January 28, 2026
- ‘Since the Coup, Factory Employers Have Increasingly Worked with the Military to Restrict Organising and Silence Workers’ Wednesday, January 28, 2026
Learn more about the related issues: