Corruption: Promises, But Not Enough Progress from G20 Countries
ROME/BERLIN, Feb 27 (IPS) - Open data is a pretty simple concept: governments should publish information about what they do to fight corruption– data that can be freely used, modified and shared by anyone for any purpose, according to two major international anti-corruption watchdogs. This is particularly important in the fight against corruption.
In 2015 the Group of 20 (G20) governments agreed on a set of G20 Anti-Corruption Open Data Principles. These principles aim to make crucial data public specifically because they can help stop corruption, a joint research published by Transparency International (TI) and the Web Foundation has revealed.
"In 2015 the G20 (Group of the 20 most industrialised countries) agreed that in order to help stop corruption, governments should publish data on open data platforms so that civil society could monitor the use of public resources, including how taxes are spent, how contracts are awarded and how money is funnelled into political campaigns."
Publishing this data would allow civil society to monitor things like the use of public resources and taxes, the awarding of public contracts, and the sources of political party finance, the research underlines, explaining that this would make it easier to hold governments to account and deter criminal activities like bribery and nepotism, adds the research.
"Alongside the overview report, five country-level studies (Brazil, France, Germany, Indonesia and South Africa) revealed a range of shortcomings in national commitments to G20 open data principles. The graphics below summarise the main finding and recommendation for improvement per country."
Transparency International and the Web Foundation examined the extent to which five G20 countries – Brazil, France, Germany, Indonesia and South Africa – are living up to these principles. There are individual country reports (see below) as well as an overall report.
The basic conclusion: there isn't enough progress. No country released all the data-sets required, and much of the information proved either hard to find or difficult to use.
© Inter Press Service (2017) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- MIDDLE EAST LIVE 16 March: UN scales up aid as crisis deepens into third week Monday, March 16, 2026
- War-driven energy price spikes highlight value of renewables: UN climate chief Monday, March 16, 2026
- Middle East crisis: UN health agency releases emergency funds for Lebanon, Iraq, Syria Sunday, March 15, 2026
- In Beirut, Guterres demands end to Middle East war: Civilians ‘deserve to live without fear’ Saturday, March 14, 2026
- UN Launches 300 Million Dollar Humanitarian Appeal for Lebanon Friday, March 13, 2026
- Syria’s Mobile Cultural Bus: Championing Cultural Justice, Delivering Art and Literature to Children of War Friday, March 13, 2026
- Why Does African Leadership Lack Coordination on Reparations? Friday, March 13, 2026
- Only 1 in 7 Countries is Led by a Woman – as Global Political Power Remains Dominated by Men Friday, March 13, 2026
- World News in Brief: Attacks on synagogues, Syria’s continuing rights violations, shocking abuse of women during childbirth Friday, March 13, 2026
- Myanmar at a ‘crossroads’: The world must not forsake civilians there, urges UN expert Friday, March 13, 2026
Learn more about the related issues: