Until the nuclear crisis started unfolding in Japan last week, most French citizens did not doubt that the country's 58 nuclear reactors were safe enough to continue operating for scores of years to come.
They ignored the evidence gathered by a handful of anti nuclear activists, who despite general public indifference, keep digging into the sheer unfathomable intricacies of French energy bureaucracy to find the truth about the frailty of the country's nuclear power plants.
But now, in the face of a looming nuclear catastrophe in Japan, even the most stoic French citizen would mull over whether the 'Grand Nation' is not living on the brink of a nuclear disaster.
Although no new representative opinion polls have been carried out since the first explosions were made public in the Fukushima power plant last weekend, some surveys by French news outlets suggest that a substantial number of respondents now favour a new energy policy with a reduced share of atomic power.
In fact the conservative French press, a loyal supporter of nuclear power, revealed March 16 that last year alone more than 1,000 accidents of different intensity had happened in the country's atomic power plants.
The data is official, and is part of a report on nuclear safety in France, to be presented to the national parliament next month. The report, by the national Agency of Nuclear Safety, was supposed to remain confidential, until the Fukushima nuclear disaster occurred in the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami that devastated the East Asian country.
France is the European country with the largest number of nuclear power plants in operation, and is the country most dependent on nuclear energy in the world. The country's 58 reactors in operation generate up to 80 percent of the electricity consumed in the country. The density of nuclear facilities in France is such that one is never more than 300 kilometres away from one of the atomic reactors.
For anti-nuclear activists, the high number of nuclear accidents constitutes no revelation. Stéphane Lhomme, president of the Observatory of Nuclear Energy, and activist against nuclear power since many years, told IPS that half of the nuclear power plants in operation in France are older than 25 years.
'The half of all reactors is coming to the end of their operating lives, and are suffering of all the weakness caused by age,' he told IPS.
Lhomme also pointed out that numerous nuclear reactors suffer of 'conception defects', which regularly lead to technical anomalies. 'France has been very close to nuclear disaster several times in the last 10 years,' he said.
Lhomme recalled that in December 1999, during the hurricane Martin that devastated the French South-Western Atlantic coast, the nuclear power plant of Blayais, near Bordeaux, was inundated by sea water, and had to be shut down for several days. 'We were very close to a catastrophe.'
One year earlier, in May 1998, a crack in the cooling pipe system in the Civaux power plant caused a massive radioactive leak, which went uncontrolled for several hours. The plant was shut down for ten months.
Lhomme also pointed out that several French nuclear power plants are located in seismic zones. 'The risk of an earthquake of the intensity of the last one in Japan is low in France,' Lhomme said, 'but our nuclear power plants are more fragile than their Japanese counterparts.'
Lhomme added that France's oldest nuclear power plant in Fessenheim, near the border with Germany and Switzerland, 'is located in a zone with high seismic activity and close to a river running higher than the plant's fundaments. It has had numerous technical problems, mostly in its cooling systems.' It had to be shut down because some 50 cubic meter of a radioactive gas mixture leaked into the atmosphere.
Despite ample evidence of technical shortcomings of French nuclear plants, Lhomme considers it unlikely that France would phase out nuclear energy in the near future. 'All political parties defend nuclear power, all are close one way or another to the French nuclear industrial complex and France has no alternative to nuclear power,' he said.
It was not surprising therefore that the French government initially tried to minimise the dimensions of the nuclear crisis in Japan. In a first reaction, French energy minister Eric Besson said the explosion in the Fukushima plant 'was not a catastrophe.' Later, he corrected himself, and admitted that it 'has become a nightmare.'
Besson also accepted that 'a debate on nuclear power in France is legitimate, but not indispensable. I continue to believe in the civil use of nuclear power,' he said.
French opposition parties have called for a referendum on nuclear power. The Green party leadership suggested the phasing out of nuclear power within 25 years.
But Prime Minister François Fillon dismissed as 'absurd' the conclusion, advanced by newspapers and environmental activists, that 'nuclear power is condemned for good by the accident of Fukushima.'
However, the government announced that it would control the safety of all nuclear power plants in operation.
Lhomme told IPS that the first measure France could launch to reduce its dependency on nuclear energy is to fight back 'our careless consumption of electricity. We could spare enormous amounts of electricity if only we would better isolate homes and buildings, and stop heating them with electricity.'
Some 80 percent of French households still heat with electric radiators. 'This is the consequence of a collusion between (the state-owned monopolist provider) Electricité de France and the construction and household equipment industry, which does not install gas or other heating systems in buildings,' Lhomme said.
According to négaWatt, a French association of some 350 experts on energy and environment, France could phase out nuclear power by 2035, based on a policy of energy efficiency to reduce superfluous consumption, and a massive programme for the use of renewable sources, especially the wind and the sun.
Thierry Salomon, director of négaWatt, told IPS, 'By 2035, we could shut down all nuclear power plants, and rely on small-scale hydroelectric and geothermic generators, large parks of wind turbines and photovoltaic structures, and biomass units, and still generate enough electricity to meet the country's needs.'
Following Salomon's scenario, France would by 2050 consume double as much electricity as today, and still could do without nuclear power. 'We would not go back to the use of candles,' he said. 'But we would not need nuclear power plants either.'
© Inter Press Service (2011) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service
Latest News Headlines
Read the latest news stories:
- Against All the Odds: Maternity and Mortality in Afghanistan Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- OPINION: Free Scotland, Nuclear-Free Scotland Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- Blue Halo: A Conservation Flagship, or Death Knell for Fishermen? Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- Panama Turns to Biofortification of Crops to Build Food Security Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- For These Asylum Seekers, the Journey Ends Where it Began Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- World Bank Tribunal Weighs Final Arguments in El Salvador Mining Dispute Tuesday, September 16, 2014
- Declining Majority Still Supports “Active” U.S. Role in World Affairs Monday, September 15, 2014
- A Flood of Energy Projects Clash with Mexican Communities Monday, September 15, 2014
- FILM: From Hamas Royalty to Israel's Spy Monday, September 15, 2014
- U.N. Climate Summit: Staged Parade or Reality Show? Monday, September 15, 2014