Saudi Arabia: Quash death sentence for Jordanian convicted of drug offences, urge UN experts
Thirteen independent UN human rights experts raisedconcernson Thursday over the planned execution by authorities in Saudi Arabia of a 57-year-old Jordanian citizen convicted for carrying amphetamine pills across the border in 2014, reminding that drug offences “do not meet the threshold for most serious crimes”.
Thirteen independent UN human rights experts raisedconcernson Thursday over the planned execution by authorities in Saudi Arabia of a 57-year-old Jordanian citizen convicted for carrying amphetamine pills across the border in 2014, reminding that drug offences “do not meet the threshold for most serious crimes”.
“Under international law, States that have not yet abolished the death penalty may only impose it for the ‘most serious crimes’, involving intentional killing”, the UN Human Rights Council-appointed experts said in a statement, continuing to urge the Saudi Government to “abolish the death penalty for drug convictions”.
Hussein Abo al-Kheir was arrested at the Saudi border in 2014 while driving across from Jordan.
Under the 2005 Law on Control of Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances, he was sentenced to death for alleged drug trafficking in 2015.
#SaudiArabia: Drug offences do not meet threshold for most serious crimes. UN experts are concerned a Jordanian citizen may soon be executed for carrying pills across the border in 2014. They urge #KSA to establish an official moratorium on all executions: https://t.co/ds1VhbuOPNhttps://t.co/ZiDMAwTt7G
UN_SPExpertsUse of force
If Mr. Abo-al-Kheir’s execution is carried out, he would be the 21st person to be executed in Saudi Arabia since the beginning of November.
The experts said that while in pre-trial detention, he was reportedly tortured, held incommunicado, forcibly disappeared and eventually coerced into signing a false confession.
Moreover, he was allegedly denied legal counsel and access to consular information after his arrest.
Although Mr. Abo al-Kheir's allegations of torture during his detention in Tabouk Central Prison since 2015 were reportedly not investigated, he has apparently been denied medical assistance despite deteriorating mental and physical health and near-blindness, the experts said.
“The use of evidence and confessions extracted under torture serving to convict individuals on death row, not only violates the prohibition against torture but is also in conflict with the right to fair trial under international law”, underscored the experts.
‘Discriminatory treatment’
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has found the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Abo al-Kheir to be arbitrary and without legal basis and has called for his release.
Last Friday, he was told that he would be transferred to a “death cell” in Tabouk Central Prison.
Since 10 November, 20 individuals, including 12 foreign nationals, have been executed by Saudi authorities.
“We are concerned that a disproportionate number of those being sentenced to death for drug-related offences are migrants”, the experts said.
“The practice amounts to discriminatory treatment of non-nationals.”
The experts said they were alarmed that executions happen without warning and are only confirmed after they take place in Saudi Arabia.
“The failure to provide individuals on death row timely notification about the date of their execution constitutes a form of ill-treatment”, they said.
Right to life
Alarmed also by Saudi Arabia’s decision to end its 21-month unofficial moratorium, the experts said that any measures to abolish the death penalty should be seen as progress towards the realization of the right to life.
By extension, the resumption of executions results in less protection of the right to life.
“We respectfully reiterate our call to the Government of Saudi Arabia to consider establishing an official moratorium on all executions with a view to fully abolish the death penalty and to commute the death sentences of individuals on death row for drug offences to imprisonment consistent with international human rights law”, the UN experts said.
The experts
Click here for the names of those who participated in the statement.
Special Rapporteurs and independent experts are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights theme or a country situation. The positions are honorary and the experts are not paid for their work.
© UN News (2022) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: UN News
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- UNGA’s Long-Drawn Revitalization Efforts Need a Meaningful Outcome, not Another Repetitive Regularity of an Omnibus of Redundancy Friday, December 05, 2025
- UN80 is Less a Reform Than a Survival Manual Friday, December 05, 2025
- In Zimbabwe, School Children Are Turning Waste Into Renewable Energy-Powered Lanterns Friday, December 05, 2025
- Any Resumption of US Tests May Trigger Threats from Other Nuclear Powers Friday, December 05, 2025
- Mozambique’s displaced facing massive needs as attacks intensify Friday, December 05, 2025
- Businesses Impact Nature on Which They Depend — IPBES Report Finds Thursday, December 04, 2025
- ‘Low- and Middle-Income Countries Need Better Data, Not Just Better Tech’ Thursday, December 04, 2025
- For 78 Years, the Palestinians have Been Denied their Inalienable Rights & their Right to Self-Determination Thursday, December 04, 2025
- Fresh Lens For Nuanced Multifaceted Climate Solutions Needed Thursday, December 04, 2025
- UN and partners back new measures to help millions move from vulnerability to opportunity Thursday, December 04, 2025
Learn more about the related issues: