COP30: The Real Solution to Climate Change Could be Through International Law
VICTORIA, British Columbia, Canada, November 5 (IPS) - At COP15, the developing countries were calling for the temperature to not rise above 1.5 degrees and they ignored the Copenhagen Accord which agreed to 2.0 degrees
Then at COP21, while the developing countries were still calling for the temperature to not arise above 1.5, they were ignored again. And then, the developing countries praised for their resilience for adapting to the climate change, which has been caused by developed states. In 2024, the United Nation General Assembly sought a legal opinion from the International Court of Justice on Climate change
The response was the following:
“Not only what states are required to do under international law to avert further climate change through both now and in the future, but they also have to assess the legal consequences under these obligations both through what they do and fail to do have caused significant harm to climate systems in other parts of the environment and harm to future generations as well as for those countries by virtue of geographical circumstances are vulnerable to adverse effects of climate change.”
However, a legal opinion from the court is not binding. The court can, however, provide interpretations of international law via customs or treaties such as the UN Framework on Climate Change UNFCCC.
All states are parties to UNFCCC. The objective of the Convention in Article 2 is: “stabilization of greenhouse gases at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
‘Such a level should be achieved within a time frame to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to ensure food production is not threatened and to enable economic development is done in sustainable way.’“
Under Article 4, the principles include the following:
“The parties should take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent, and minimize any adverse effects on developing countries. Lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing such measures.”
Given that the developing countries are the most affected, but least responsible for climate change, perhaps developing countries could launch a case to seek an interpretation by the ICJ of both the article 2 and the precautionary principle
Dr Joan Russow is founder of the Global Compliance Research Project, formed in 1995 to document state non-compliance with international law.
IPS UN Bureau
© Inter Press Service (20251105060627) — All Rights Reserved. Original source: Inter Press Service
Where next?
Browse related news topics:
Read the latest news stories:
- Living Longer at Age 80 Monday, August 10, 2026
- Asia’s Energy Progress Is Great, But Must Pick Up Pace Monday, August 10, 2026
- Where Some See Waste, Others See Opportunity: Young Sierra Leoneans Fight Against Electronic Waste, Plastic Pollution Monday, August 10, 2026
- INDIA: ‘The Cockroach Janta Party Brings Together Everyone Who Has Been Neglected for Years’ Monday, August 10, 2026
- Palestinian Children Deserve Education, not Ethnic Cleansing Monday, August 10, 2026
- Sudan: ‘It made me dream again’: The students refusing to let war stop their education Sunday, August 09, 2026
- For Brazil’s Indigenous youth, visibility is resistance Saturday, August 08, 2026
- In Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan, One Woman Refuses a Life of Dependence Friday, August 07, 2026
- Hiroshima’s Question: Will We Continue to Live Under the Nuclear Shadow? Friday, August 07, 2026
- Burkina Faso’s Cancelled Democracy Friday, August 07, 2026